Penetration testing evidence for your ISO 27001 audit

Threat emulation schedule with dates, sources, statuses, and a vulnerabilities list with severity and fix status.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 asks organisations to assess and treat information security risk, and penetration testing is the technical evidence auditors expect behind Annex A controls such as 8.8, 8.25 and 8.29. Strike runs continuous penetration testing with AI-led execution and expert human validation, and delivers reports that support audit and compliance programs. Strike supports the process; your certification body issues the certificate. Source: ISO, accessed 29 July 2026 — see the reference below.

Built for the three-year ISO 27001 certification cycle

Teams heading into a Stage 2 audit that need findings closed and retested before the auditor arrives, not open items to explain.

Already-certified organisations, whose surveillance audits in years one and two keep sampling whether the controls still work.

Security leads who need testing evidence that maps cleanly to Annex A and attaches to the risk treatment plan and Statement of Applicability.

User interface with sections titled 'Strikers assigned' showing two profile pictures and their details, and an 'Export' panel with options to include Findings Summary, Assessment Updates, and Compliance Checklist, with a Download button.
[ ISO 27001 ]

ISO 27001 penetration testing: what the standard states, and where testing fits

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 never names the penetration test as a mandatory activity. What it requires is a risk-based information security management system: you identify risk, you treat it, and you demonstrate that your controls actually work. Penetration testing is the evidence that carries the most weight in that demonstration, because it shows a control holding or failing under a real attack rather than on paper.

[ THE THREE-YEAR CYCLE ]

An ISO 27001 certificate is valid for three years. Year one and year two bring surveillance audits — sampled reviews confirming the ISMS is still operating — and year three is a full recertification audit that resets the cycle. A single pentest booked four weeks before the Stage 2 audit documents one moment in a thirty-six-month story. Everything shipped in the other thirty-five months has no evidence behind it.

[ WHERE AUDITORS LOOK FOR TESTING EVIDENCE ]

Annex A 8.8 — Management of technical vulnerabilities: you have to obtain information about vulnerabilities in the systems you use, evaluate your exposure and act on it. Penetration testing surfaces the exposures no vulnerability feed will ever tell you about, because they live in your own business logic.

Annex A 8.25 — Secure development life cycle: security has to be designed into development rather than bolted on afterwards. Testing that runs with each release is the practical proof that the lifecycle is real and not a document.

Annex A 8.29 — Security testing in development and acceptance: a defined testing strategy, executed during development and before acceptance, in properly separated environments, by competent testers. The control does not mandate a penetration test — code review and automated testing also qualify. Most organisations run one anyway, because it is the method an auditor recognises immediately.

[ WHAT THE AUDITOR ACTUALLY ASKS TO SEE ]

Traceability: what was in scope, who tested it and with what competence, what they found, how each finding was rated, when it was fixed, and proof that the fix works. And the stop button — evidence that a release was genuinely held back because a security test failed. Continuous testing produces that trail as a by-product; an annual engagement produces one report and then eleven months of silence.

[ WHERE STRIKE FITS — AND WHERE IT DOES NOT ]

Strike does not certify ISO 27001 and cannot: the certificate is issued by an accredited certification body after its own audit. What Strike produces is the technical evidence that body asks for — continuous penetration testing executed by AI with expert human validation before customer delivery, retesting whose availability depends on the subscribed scope, and reports you can hand to the auditor and attach to your Statement of Applicability.

Reference: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements (ISO), accessed 29 July 2026. Annex A control numbering follows the 2022 revision. Strike does not issue certificates; certification is granted by an accredited certification body following its own audit.

Strike-reported metrics on this page: 97% precision / 3% false positives, and more than 6,000 critical vulnerabilities reported. These are figures Strike reports about its own platform, not third-party benchmarks; the scope, definitions and measurement dates behind each are set out in how Strike measures results.

[ ANNEX A IS A REFERENCE SET, NOT A REQUIREMENT LIST ]

ISO 27001 penetration testing and Annex A: a reference set, not a requirement list

This is the distinction almost every compliance page collapses, and it is the one that decides how you answer an auditor. In ISO/IEC 27001:2022 the numbered clauses 4 to 10 are the mandatory part of the standard and cannot be excluded from a conforming ISMS. Annex A is a different kind of thing: per the text of the standard, it is a reference set of information security controls, from which an organisation selects on the basis of its own risk assessment. Where an organisation determines that a control is not applicable, that determination and its justification are recorded in the Statement of Applicability.

The consequence, stated plainly: ISO 27001 does not mandate penetration testing. No clause and no Annex A control names a penetration test as an activity an organisation has to carry out. Anyone who tells you the standard obliges you to run one is describing common audit practice rather than the text of the standard.

So why does the auditor ask for a pentest? Because the auditor is sampling whether the controls you selected are operating effectively, and testing evidence is one of the forms of proof an auditor recognises immediately. The request is real. Its basis is your own Statement of Applicability and risk treatment plan, not a line in Annex A that obliges anyone.

What that changes about how you answer it: if you selected Annex A 8.8, 8.25 or 8.29, you also chose the methods that demonstrate them. Penetration testing is one method; code review and automated testing are others, and ISO does not rank them. If you excluded a control, the justification in your Statement of Applicability is what the auditor reads instead of a test report. Either way, the evidence has to trace back to the risk it treats.

Where this leaves an ISO 27001 pentest in practice: most certified organisations run one, because it is the fastest way to show a control holding or failing under real attack conditions rather than on paper. That is a decision about evidence quality, not about obligation, and it is worth making deliberately rather than because a vendor said the standard forced your hand.

Sources: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements (ISO), accessed 29 July 2026, including amendment ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024. Annex A control numbering follows the 2022 revision. The full text of the standard is paid access from ISO; the catalogue page cited here is publicly accessible. Strike supports audit and compliance programs; it does not issue ISO certificates, and certification is granted by an accredited certification body following its own audit.

[ FAQ ]

ISO 27001 penetration testing, answered

Is an ISO 27001 pentest the same thing as ISO 27001 penetration testing?

Yes. ISO 27001 pentest is simply shorthand for the same engagement, and neither phrase appears in the standard. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 makes clauses 4 to 10 the mandatory part of the standard, and per the text of the standard Annex A is a reference set of controls an organisation selects from on the basis of its own risk assessment, recording any exclusion and its justification in the Statement of Applicability. So the phrase describes a testing engagement scoped to support an ISO 27001 programme, not a control you can point at in the text. Source: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (ISO), accessed 29 July 2026.

What testing evidence does an ISO 27001 auditor actually ask for?

Scope, methodology, the competence of the testers, the findings with their severity ratings, remediation dates, proof that each fix was retested, and the link back to your risk treatment plan and Statement of Applicability. A report with no retest and no traceability to the risk register is weak evidence.

When in the certification process should we test?

Before the Stage 2 audit at the latest, so findings arrive closed rather than open. Ideally testing is continuous, because the surveillance audits in years one and two also sample control effectiveness, and the recertification audit in year three looks back across the whole cycle.

Can the same testing also serve SOC 2 and PCI DSS?

Largely yes. The technical work overlaps heavily across frameworks; what changes is how the evidence is packaged and which controls it maps to. Strike runs one continuous testing programme and produces reports that support each framework rather than three disconnected engagements.

What role does Strike play for ISO 27001?

Strike supports ISO 27001 with penetration testing evidence — only an accredited certification body can issue the certificate, after its own audit. Strike provides the technical evidence, retest records and reports that support audit and compliance programs, which the audit relies on.

How much does it cost and how long does it take?

Strike works as a continuous subscription scoped to your attack surface rather than a one-off fixed-price project, so cost depends on scope and assets. Setup takes under 5 minutes once the target information and access are ready, for supported scopes. Separately, once testing is running, findings arrive in 1–2 hours. Contact us for a scoped quote.

Kind of — ISO/IEC 27001:2022 makes clauses 4 to 10 the mandatory part of the standard, and per the text of the standard Annex A is a reference set of controls from which an organisation selects on the basis of its own risk assessment, recording any exclusion and its justification in the Statement of Applicability. What ISO 27001 asks for is a risk assessment, a risk treatment plan and evidence that the controls you selected are effective. Penetration testing is the evidence auditors recognise most readily behind Annex A 8.8, 8.25 and 8.29, and most certified organisations run one. The standard leaves the method open; the audit rarely does. Source: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (ISO), accessed 29 July 2026.

Boost your experience with Hybrid Testing Booster

Continuous Hybrid Testing

Emulated, deep stealth-based attacks executed by creative, unconventional security experts. Find out how real attackers would breach your systems, and stop them before they do.

Testimonial

Trusted by security teams that lead

"Product was great! The team was exceptional when addressing our sense of urgency with regards to an important timeline, and they were able to deliver effectively and finding important vulnerabilities within our systems."

Head of Engineering
Banking · Gartner Peer Insights review

"Good option for agile testing, especially if GTM timelines are tight. This is especially important when the release train comes with a lot of new products and releases, making it hard to keep the pace in a traditional ad-hoc business model."

Product Security Leader, Cybersecurity
Hardware · Gartner Peer Insights review

“Strike provides continuous pentesting for our critical web and mobile features. Each month they help us validate new functionalities in production, delivering relevant vulnerabilities and strong value for money. We are very satisfied with their innovative and customer-centric approach.”

Chief Information Security Officer
Retail · Gartner Peer Insights review

"Strike team was fast and provided the exact solution we needed for our use case. We decided to go for Strike because they provide a pen-testing suite that fits the way we work in terms of speed and communication. Highly recommended!"

Gartner review
Chief Technical Officer
Banking · Gartner Peer Insights review

"We greatly value our partnership with Strike. Their exceptional penetration testing services and effective communication have significantly enhanced our cybersecurity, ensuring the safety and trust of our customers' financial information."

Information Security Officer
Strike customer

"The management of communication channels and the centralization of interactions with the team made the experience much more agile and effective. Having everything in one place was a huge advantage and allowed us to complete the pentest within just a few weeks."

CTO
Horizon

“Working with Strike is extremely important to us, especially because they deliver quality work over our products in a continuous way, and provide constant follow-up when it comes to managing the already found vulnerabilities. Moreover, they are constantly making improvements in their SaaS platform so we can have the best experience possible. In case we have a problem, they listen and help us. That’s invaluable.”

Sr AppSec Red Team
NaranjaX

“Working with Strike was an excellent experience for us. We were able to create our own pentests and change their scope each month. The Strikers are world-class professionals who provide us with relevant findings quickly and efficiently. Also, automated tools like Phishing Monitor are really interesting for our company, because they help us spot fake domains trying to impersonate our brand.”

CISO
Strike customer

“For us, security is the most important aspect, not only on the surface but throughout our entire product. When we reached out to Strike, we were looking for someone that could test & find vulnerabilities across our entire stack. We are very happy that we have found the right partner to achieve that, and we are looking forward to continuing this important work together.”

CEO & CTO
Strike customer

Human expertise.
AI power.
Superior security.

Whether you’re scaling fast, closing enterprise deals, or just tired of noisy reports, we’ll help you build a security stack that moves faster than your threats.

Book a Demo