PCI DSS penetration testing: what Requirement 11.4 asks for

Threat emulation schedule with dates, sources, statuses, and a vulnerabilities list with severity and fix status.

PCI DSS v4.0.1 places penetration testing in Requirement 11.4, and it says more than most summaries of it do. It sets a floor of at least once every 12 months, adds significant change as a separate trigger, asks for the test to be repeated after fixes, puts service providers on a six-month clock for segmentation, and states — seven times — that the tester does not have to be a QSA. This page quotes the requirement text and links it. Source: PCI SSC, accessed 29 July 2026 — see the reference below.

Built for the entities PCI DSS treats differently

PSPs, acquirers and processors. If your organisation is a service provider under PCI DSS, your segmentation testing clock is six months, not twelve. Requirement 11.4.6 is the one most often missed by teams reading merchant-shaped guidance.

Merchants with a segmented CDE. If segmentation is what keeps your cardholder data environment small, the segmentation controls are themselves in scope for testing under 11.4.5 — and their effectiveness is what your scope reduction rests on.

Teams preparing for a QSA. The evidence a QSA looks for is a defined methodology, the test results, the remediation, and the retest. Requirement 11.4.1 lists nine things that methodology has to include.

User interface with sections titled 'Strikers assigned' showing two profile pictures and their details, and an 'Export' panel with options to include Findings Summary, Assessment Updates, and Compliance Checklist, with a Download button.
[ PCI DSS 11.4 ]

What PCI DSS asks for, and where penetration testing fits

[ THE STRUCTURE ]

You need to regularly run pentests. Requirement 11.4 sits inside Requirement 11, Test Security of Systems and Networks Regularly. The section heading reads: "External and internal penetration testing is regularly performed, and exploitable vulnerabilities and security weaknesses are corrected." It breaks into seven sub-requirements, 11.4.1 through 11.4.7.

[ THE METHODOLOGY — 11.4.1 ]

Before cadence, the standard asks for a documented approach. Requirement 11.4.1 states that "A penetration testing methodology is defined, documented, and implemented by the entity" and lists what it includes — among them "Coverage for the entire CDE perimeter and critical systems", "Testing from both inside and outside the network", "Testing to validate any segmentation and scope-reduction controls", "Review and consideration of threats and vulnerabilities experienced in the last 12 months", and "Retention of penetration testing results and remediation activities results for at least 12 months."

[ THE CADENCE — 11.4.2 AND 11.4.3 ]

Internal and external penetration testing are handled separately and worded almost identically. Both state that testing is performed "Per the entity's defined methodology", "At least once every 12 months", and "After any significant infrastructure or application upgrade or change."

Two things are worth reading closely. The frequency is "at least once every 12 months" — a floor, and the standard's own words, which is not the same statement as a yearly event. And change is a separate trigger sitting alongside it, not a footnote to it. An environment that ships weekly meets the second condition far more often than the first.

[ WHO PERFORMS IT — AND THE MISCONCEPTION ]

This is where PCI DSS is most often misread. Requirements 11.4.2 and 11.4.3 both state that testing is performed "By a qualified internal resource or qualified external third-party" and that "Organizational independence of the tester exists (not required to be a QSA or ASV)."

That parenthesis is in the standard, and it appears seven times across Requirement 11.4. PCI DSS does not ask for the penetration test to be performed by a QSA or an ASV. It asks for a qualified tester who is organisationally independent of the systems being tested. QSAs assess compliance; ASVs are separately named for the vulnerability scanning requirement, not for penetration testing. On qualifications the standard's guidance points to "Specific penetration testing certifications" and "Prior experience conducting penetration testing" as considerations, not as a defined bar.

[ THE RETEST — 11.4.4 ]

Requirement 11.4.4 states that exploitable vulnerabilities and security weaknesses found during penetration testing are corrected "In accordance with the entity's assessment of the risk posed by the security issue", and then adds one line that changes the shape of the whole requirement: "Penetration testing is repeated to verify the corrections."

The test is not the deliverable. The verified fix is. A programme that produces a report and stops has met part of 11.4 and not the part that closes it.

[ SEGMENTATION — 11.4.5 AND 11.4.6 ]

Where segmentation isolates the CDE, the segmentation controls are tested too. For all entities, 11.4.5 states "At least once every 12 months and after any changes to segmentation controls/methods". For service providers, 11.4.6 states "At least once every six months and after any changes to segmentation controls/methods." Both ask for confirmation that the controls are "operational and effective, and isolate the CDE from all out-of-scope systems."

[ MULTI-TENANT PROVIDERS — 11.4.7 ]

Multi-tenant service providers support their customers' external penetration testing per 11.4.3 and 11.4.4. It is the only sub-requirement in 11.4 that carried a future date: its applicability note read "This requirement is a best practice until 31 March 2025, after which it will be required and must be fully considered during a PCI DSS assessment." That date has passed. 11.4.1 through 11.4.6 carried no such note and were effective immediately.

[ WHERE STRIKE FITS ]

Strike is a continuous hybrid validation platform: AI-driven Threat Emulations with expert human validation before customer delivery. Against the shape of Requirement 11.4, three things line up.

Testing can be triggered by changes according to configured scope, which is the 11.4.2/11.4.3 change condition rather than a calendar. Findings are reproduced and confirmed before they reach you, at 97% precision / 3% false positives (Strike-reported — how we measure results), because a finding a QSA cannot follow is not evidence. And retesting — the 11.4.4 line — is part of the operating model rather than a separate engagement, though retesting availability depends on the subscribed scope.

Two honest limits. Coverage depends on authorised scope and access; a segmentation test under 11.4.5 or 11.4.6 has to be scoped deliberately, and it is a different exercise from perimeter testing. And Strike does not determine your compliance: Strike supports audit and compliance programmes and does not issue PCI DSS attestations. Sufficiency for 11.4 is your QSA's judgement.

Setup takes under 5 minutes on supported scopes, and the first curated findings arrive in 1–2 hours (both Strike-reported — how we measure results). Scoping and authorisation happen before that, and they are a separate clock from either number. To date, US$4.5B+ in risk mitigated (Strike-reported — how we measure results).

[ FAQ ]

PCI DSS and penetration testing, answered

Does PCI DSS ask for an annual penetration test?

YES. The standard's wording is "At least once every 12 months", in Requirements 11.4.2 and 11.4.3. Both also name "After any significant infrastructure or application upgrade or change" as a separate condition, so twelve months is a floor rather than a schedule.

Does the penetration test have to be performed by a QSA?

No. Requirements 11.4.2, 11.4.3, 11.4.5 and 11.4.6 each state that testing is performed "By a qualified internal resource or qualified external third party" and that "Organizational independence of the tester exists (not required to be a QSA or ASV)."

Can our own team perform it?

The standard permits "a qualified internal resource", subject to organisational independence — the tester being separate from the management of the target systems. It does not define a certification bar; its guidance treats certifications and prior experience as considerations.

Is a vulnerability scan enough?

No. PCI DSS addresses scanning and penetration testing in different requirements. Requirement 11.4.1 asks the methodology to include "Application-layer penetration testing" and "Network-layer penetration tests", which a scan does not perform.

How often do service providers test segmentation?

Requirement 11.4.6, which applies only to service providers, states "At least once every six months and after any changes to segmentation controls/methods." For all other entities 11.4.5 sets twelve months.

Which version of PCI DSS is current?

PCI DSS v4.0.1, published June 2024. PCI SSC opened a request for comments on v4.0.1 in June 2026 as the starting point for the next iteration, and v4.0.1 remains the published version. No retirement date for v4.0.1 or publication date for a successor was found in the public materials reviewed on 29 July 2026.

Sources, accessed 29 July 2026. Requirement text quoted from PCI DSS v4.0.1 (June 2024), Requirement 11.4, as reproduced in the PCI DSS v4.0.1 Report on Compliance Template (PCI SSC). Current version confirmed against Request for Comments: PCI DSS v4.0.1 (PCI SSC, 3 June 2026). The standard itself is available from the PCI SSC Document Library and is released under a click-through licence agreement. Strike does not issue PCI DSS attestations and is not a QSA; this page summarises publicly available requirement text and is not legal or compliance advice. Sufficiency for Requirement 11.4 is determined by your assessor.

Boost your experience with Hybrid Testing Booster

Continuous Hybrid Testing

Emulated, deep stealth-based attacks executed by creative, unconventional security experts. Find out how real attackers would breach your systems, and stop them before they do.

Testimonial

Trusted by security teams that lead

"Product was great! The team was exceptional when addressing our sense of urgency with regards to an important timeline, and they were able to deliver effectively and finding important vulnerabilities within our systems."

Head of Engineering
Banking · Gartner Peer Insights review

"Good option for agile testing, especially if GTM timelines are tight. This is especially important when the release train comes with a lot of new products and releases, making it hard to keep the pace in a traditional ad-hoc business model."

Product Security Leader, Cybersecurity
Hardware · Gartner Peer Insights review

“Strike provides continuous pentesting for our critical web and mobile features. Each month they help us validate new functionalities in production, delivering relevant vulnerabilities and strong value for money. We are very satisfied with their innovative and customer-centric approach.”

Chief Information Security Officer
Retail · Gartner Peer Insights review

"Strike team was fast and provided the exact solution we needed for our use case. We decided to go for Strike because they provide a pen-testing suite that fits the way we work in terms of speed and communication. Highly recommended!"

Gartner review
Chief Technical Officer
Banking · Gartner Peer Insights review

"We greatly value our partnership with Strike. Their exceptional penetration testing services and effective communication have significantly enhanced our cybersecurity, ensuring the safety and trust of our customers' financial information."

Information Security Officer
Strike customer

"The management of communication channels and the centralization of interactions with the team made the experience much more agile and effective. Having everything in one place was a huge advantage and allowed us to complete the pentest within just a few weeks."

CTO
Horizon

“Working with Strike is extremely important to us, especially because they deliver quality work over our products in a continuous way, and provide constant follow-up when it comes to managing the already found vulnerabilities. Moreover, they are constantly making improvements in their SaaS platform so we can have the best experience possible. In case we have a problem, they listen and help us. That’s invaluable.”

Sr AppSec Red Team
NaranjaX

“Working with Strike was an excellent experience for us. We were able to create our own pentests and change their scope each month. The Strikers are world-class professionals who provide us with relevant findings quickly and efficiently. Also, automated tools like Phishing Monitor are really interesting for our company, because they help us spot fake domains trying to impersonate our brand.”

CISO
Strike customer

“For us, security is the most important aspect, not only on the surface but throughout our entire product. When we reached out to Strike, we were looking for someone that could test & find vulnerabilities across our entire stack. We are very happy that we have found the right partner to achieve that, and we are looking forward to continuing this important work together.”

CEO & CTO
Strike customer

Human expertise.
AI power.
Superior security.

Whether you’re scaling fast, closing enterprise deals, or just tired of noisy reports, we’ll help you build a security stack that moves faster than your threats.

Book a Demo